PORTOVIEJO, Ecuador–I awake to pounding on the thin wooden door of my jungle hotel room. It’s 7:02 a.m. As I groggily open the door, I’m met by a slender woman in a gray dress standing outside. Her hair is wet. “The mayor is waiting for you. You have to see him at 8 o’clock,” she says, in a mix of English and Spanish. “Levántate!” calls out my roommate, Juan.
We had no prior contact with the mayor of Portoviejo, one of the worst damaged cities in Ecuador, but this is how it always starts: a call.
We meet at the radio station next door to the funky, thatched-roof lodgings we call our “hotel.” While right next to the modern downtown, it’s more like a commune in the jungle, and many of the guests seem to live here. Guests are a mix of stranded locals and international aid workers. Nonetheless, with its strong Ecuadorian coffee in the morning, cold local beer at night and spotty internet, it’s a haven of sorts in the midst of this urban earthquake disaster.
The mayor of this remote Ecuadorean coastal town looks as I had imagined he would. His hair is gray and black, slicked, combed-back across his head. He looks thoughtful, with a nicely pressed shirt tucked into his trim waistband. He wants to know more about our experience responding to earthquake disasters as he explores the ways we can help him. I tell him that there are many similarities in disaster recovery processes for urban disasters. Some do well. Some screw things up pretty badly.
He speaks quickly and directly: “I need your advice. I think our engineers are doing a good job, but I want to compare our findings to another expert opinion. Some tell me most of buildings need to be taken down. I want to know if it is true or if my town can be saved. If you tell me we need to take everything down, I will. But I need to know.” He promptly sends us to the city’s former airfield, now a staging area for orange-vested first responders.
A stern, husky policemen motion us through barricades to a small area where officers in neat lines flank us as we approach. Their superior shouts out an explanation of who we are and our mission, and asks for volunteers to assist us. Two officers step forward, one more senior than the other. They introduce themselves with curt nods and broad smiles.
Portoviejo’s once vibrant downtown, once home to 223,000 souls, is now a fenced-off, 40-block Red Zone. Over 200 people died here when the earthquake hit at 7 p.m. on a Saturday. I look out into the street ahead of us. A broken, 8 -story tower tilts precariously over the debris-strewn street like the Leaning Tower of Pisa, only far more dangerous. It could collapse at any minute.
Some tell me most of the buildings need to be taken down. I want to know if it is true or if my town can be saved.Portoviejo Vice Mayor
We split into two teams to conduct our assessment, walking block to block as the tropical sun beats down on us in 80 percent humidity. Through all the discomfort there is a silver lining: the damage is not as bad as advertised. 50 to 60 percent of buildings are not damaged; roughly 30 percent have only slight damage; Ten to 20 percent are badly damaged or have collapsed. As we pass, various owners extracting valuables from their businesses stop us, “Can you check my building? Not sure how bad it is. Need a technical opinion. Por favor. Si se pueden.”
We climb scores of stairs. Eight floors, three floors, ten more floors to the terrace. My “earthquake shoes” crunch on fallen plaster, bricks and glass; we light our headlamps to pass through the darkness. I essentially own one pair of shoes: Ecco shoes. I use them for everything from responding to disasters to meeting prime ministers… after cleaning them up a little. They are the perfect small size to fit in my luggage.
We enter Portoviejo’s badly damaged Municipal Building, which includes the mayor’s own office. Entire walls have collapsed, leaving only gaping holes. This is especially prevalent in the stairwell, which looks like a war zone. Entire offices hang open to the outside world – desks, filing cabinets and coffeemakers hanging on for dear life.
It looks terrible, but the truth is, this is all repairable. The concrete columns remain intact. None of the damage, although substantial, is structural. As we leave, a young man in a bright blue shirt runs across the street to intercept us. “I hate to bother you, but… can we assess his school? Classes for 400 students are supposed to start in a few weeks and no one knows how to move forward. Can we look at the damage? It would be so appreciated.”
Downstairs, the few cracks observed are superficial and the concrete columns are solid. Upstairs, the interior wall damage is horrifying. A brick wall dividing classrooms fell and smashed the desk of a teacher and some students. What the quake hadn’t occured on a Saturday evening? What if class had been in session? This could have been 10 a.m. on a Monday.
We venture deeper into the Red Zone. Heavy machinery with mechanical claws pull down entire buildings. We pass a communications company flattened by the earthquake. The mayor summons us via our trusted police companion, Officer Zambrano, who is armed with a walkie-talkie. We begin to leave when another desperate person approaches, pointing to his building. It looks undamaged except that the entire fourth level of the building next door toppled onto his roof. The police want us to go, but, like always, I want to help this man.
We crunch upstairs through more glass and plaster. Inside, is a beautiful apartment with impressive furniture. Next to the bed sits a photo of the man and his kids. He leads us to a back room where a toppled building has punched through six inches of concrete and buried its head in his ceiling. It hangs by steel threads.
And yet his building’s structural system is intact. I tell him,”This is all repairable. Your main structural system is intact.” He sighs, relieved, and smiles widely. In his eyes I see direction, and hope. This is what people need in a disaster.
We arrive at a campus that has become a command center. Dell computers, copy machines and paper cover every flat surface. They bring a young planning director to us who immediately, in rapid-fire fashion, spends eight minutes spelling out everything they’ve done and plan to do. He’s very intelligent and motivated. I compliment the job they are doing, their organization, their detailed maps showing the extent of the damage. “But you have this huge red zone going on,” I say. “This could prolong reconstruction and really hurt your downtown, perhaps indefinitely.” I brought up Italy 2008 and Christchurch 2011, where ‘downtown’ barely exists anymore. Too long of a red-zone period is not a good thing.
The Vice Mayor shows up unexpectedly. I tell him the same story. “Government alone can’t fix this town. The private sector must carry the majority of the burden of recovery and reconstruction. If the government helps private owners to do their job, they will do it. “Andale!” he says. “This is exactly what we are thinking.” He already had a plan to shrink the red zone, but unsafe areas caused by falling buildings and objects must be identified and condoned.
He asks us to come back tomorrow at 8 a.m. to strategize their most dangerous areas. I kindly tell him that, “No, I can not do the work. But I would be more than happy to work with your engineers tomorrow, so they can learn and take it from there.”
To me, this is the heart and soul of disaster reconstruction: working with with locals to create the capacity to enable them to rebuild. It is a subtle, but crucial strategy. Building capacity in disaster-stricken communities creates jobs and the knowledge base. We lose so much in disaster. Why not give something back?